Serving younger borrowers: the impact of inaccessible lending

5 min read|Published March 05, 2024
This image depicts a medium closeup of a woman standing with her back to a building, reading something on her mobile phone.

Manual verification has the most impact on lenders’ operating costs, according to our new research. Capturing and authenticating application information is the largest cost for an estimated 25% of lenders. Meanwhile, the next generation of borrowers say they are willing to provide lenders with their financial data to secure loans.

TL;DR – Quick summary

  • New data from Tink suggests that cumbersome manual processes are detrimental to operating costs – 25% of lenders surveyed say document validation is their biggest expense

  • An estimated 32% of lenders say manual income verification is the most time-consuming step in their own risk decisioning

  • Data-driven risk assessment models could be a key solution as younger borrowers appear willing to provide their financial data to lenders

TL;DR – Quick summary

  • New data from Tink suggests that cumbersome manual processes are detrimental to operating costs – 25% of lenders surveyed say document validation is their biggest expense

  • An estimated 32% of lenders say manual income verification is the most time-consuming step in their own risk decisioning

  • Data-driven risk assessment models could be a key solution as younger borrowers appear willing to provide their financial data to lenders

Our new research suggests that for lenders, cumbersome manual processes can be a costly and time-consuming element of their daily business. An estimated 32% of lenders cite manual income verification as the most time-consuming step in their own risk decisioning process. A quarter (25%) of survey participants say document validation – capturing application information and analysing its authenticity – is the largest expense they face.

Meanwhile, as consumers continue to navigate the cost-of-living crisis, our research also shows that younger age groups face significant barriers when it comes to accessing credit. According to our new survey of 1,000 UK borrowers, over three quarters (78%) of 18–34 year olds have had a loan application rejected. When asked why they’d been disqualified from a loan, 12% cited thin credit history – not having enough credit history to qualify – and 11% were rejected due to an inability to prove their financial history.

The effect of cumbersome processes on loan applications

Tink’s insights indicate that younger age groups are abandoning arduous applications, suggesting they have zero tolerance for friction-filled processes – and consequently, may not be capitalising on the financial services available to them.

The research shows that nearly a quarter (22%) of 18-34 year olds have abandoned a loan application – and used a different lender because the process was too cumbersome. What's more, when applying for a loan, 20% of respondents said they had the correct documents, yet abandoned the process due to having to manually submit them (e.g. printing and posting them).

A Tink survey of 200 UK lenders supports these findings with 36% of lenders surveyed citing manual income verification as the highest dropoff point in the loan application process.

Appetite for data-driven decision making 

As a solution to overcome these barriers, younger age groups are willing to permit lenders to view transaction data from their bank accounts in return for smoother application processes and a better chance of securing a loan.

For example, encouragingly 40% of 18–34 year olds surveyed would allow lenders to digitally view their bank account transaction data to improve the application process (in other words, removing the need to manually submit documents on income and expenditure), while over half (57%) would like the option of having loans tailored to their financial situation (such as repayment plans which adapt to their monthly incomings and outgoings).

Additionally, the research highlights that lenders recognise that improving the loan application process makes sound business sense. More than three quarters (78%) of lenders surveyed agree it’s important to reduce friction in lending applications to gain a competitive advantage. 77% say improving risk decisioning models is crucial to a more accurate view of people’s finances.

“Our research highlights a clear access issue amongst younger generations trying to borrow. Not only are a significant amount wrestling with cumbersome application processes, they’re also being rejected for loans based on factors that suggest blinkered financial assessments," says Jack Spiers, Banking & Lending Director at Tink.

“It is important lenders are harnessing data-driven risk decisioning solutions to offer fair, accurate affordability checks, while also removing the friction associated with manual application submissions. And it’s not just benefiting the end user. Adopting these models can help lenders too – boosting customer acquisition through improved success rates, while reducing operational costs.”

Discover new ways to empower borrowers while future proofing your bottom line today. Get in touch to explore how our risk decisioning solutions can help you get ahead.

Also on this topic
Lending levelled up white paper
Lending, levelled up

A Tink white paper - How to elevate affordability assessments with enriched data.

Get the white paper


About the research

Consumer research was conducted by Censuswide on behalf of Tink in September 2023, amongst 1,000 UK borrowers aged over 18 (i.e. those who currently have either a mortgage or a loan).

Lender research was conducted by Censuswide on behalf of Tink in September 2023 amongst 200 executives at a High street bank, Building society, Challenger bank, Payday lender or BNPL lender who have a decision-making role in the lending process.

Case studies, comparisons, statistics, research and recommendations are provided “AS IS” and intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for operational, marketing, legal, technical, tax, financial or other advice. Visa Inc. neither makes any warranty or representation as to the completeness or accuracy of the information within this document, nor assumes any liability or responsibility that may result from reliance on such information. The Information contained herein is not intended as investment or legal advice, and readers are encouraged to seek the advice of a competent professional where such advice is required.

More in Open banking

Instant Payments Regulation
2024-04-08 · 6 min read
How the Instant Payments Regulation will change the EU payments landscape

We explore the details of the Instant Payments Regulation, as well as its benefits for consumers and PSPs – such as increased convenience, more innovation in the market, and reduced costs.

Open banking
This image depicts a woman at a desk, holding a phone in position to scan the QR code of a paper invoice.
2024-03-07 · 6 min read
Smart moves with smart meters: how commercial VRP could support pay-as-you-use billing models

Discover how variable recurring payments can transform smart meter billing into a more flexible user experience – and utility providers more ways to support financially vulnerable customers.

Open banking
EU flag
2024-02-21 · 10 min read
The full SPAA treatment – Tink signs up for new EU scheme

Tink has become one of the first participants of the European Payments Council’s SPAA scheme. We explain why SPAA was needed and how it could be the catalyst to transform account-to-account payments in the European Union.

Open banking

Get started with Tink

Contact our team to learn more about what we can help you build – or create an account to get started right away.

Rocket